Article Title

Author Name

{CATEGORY}

{date}

{#hash1}

{#hash2}

Illustrations by {name}

{excerpt} A sprint is when a company or team dedicates a certain amount of time (around 2-4 weeks) to work on a specific project at full speed.

{0} Min read

Profile picture of Elizabeth Goodspeed

5 min read

Website footers are (literally) bigger than ever. Here's why

When it comes to website footers, bigger is better.

A screenshot of the footer of a website called "East hub", which displays its name in oversize, all-caps type.

Stay informed on all things design.

Thanks for submitting!

Shaping Design is created on Editor X, the advanced web design platform for professionals. Create your next project on Editor X. 

What to say of the page footer? For years, the footer has been a necessary but maligned feature of the contemporary website, a shapeless container for legalese, no more than a functional period at the end of a sentence—likelier to be hidden than celebrated. Eternally relegated to the bottom by definition, the footer was never particularly considered, let alone highlighted. And yet, one of the biggest trends in web design of 2022 has emerged, and within it, a starring role for the internet’s greatest underdog. Meet The Big Footer™.


The Big Footer trend is quite self-explanatory. Scroll down to the bottom of any of your favorite new websites and there’s a strong chance you’ll encounter it in the wild. There at the bottom, beneath the FAQ, privacy policy, and terms of service, it sits: a giant 100vw logo (in non css-parlance: a logo the width of the full browser window). Sometimes the logo is cropped from below, as in Aruliden’s design for Pet Plate, or not in the footer at all (showing up instead within the first homepage module), as in Alright Studio’s work for Marco, but usually the logo is unencumbered, in all its glory, boldly grounding the bottom of the page.


Images clockwise, courtesy: Aruliden for PetPlate; Concrete for Twice; Cory-OKeefe for Parallel. Image 4: an original concept built on Editor X by Anita Goldstein.



Big Footers, and large text on the web in general, undoubtedly draw from conventions in the adjacent fields of print and editorial design. What is a big footer if not a kind of masthead? The Big Logo itself has deep roots in luxury fashion, with brands like Jil Sander, Miu Miu, and Kenzo embracing the minimalism of a large, lone logo locked to a baseline—and not much else—for many years on their packaging and, later on, in their digital applications. Like all trends, this one has trickled down from high-end to mass-market, now seen in wellness (Someone and Others for Starface), tech (Cory-OKeefe’s Parallel) and large CPG brands (Concrete for Twice) alike. But despite its growing use, it still brings some of that same luxury confidence and pomp, as well as capital-B “Brand Recognition”, to any space it occupies.


But why now? Much has been written about the wave of sans-serif rebrands that dominated the past fifteen years of identity design, but a more infrequently discussed factor is the way in which the growing reliance on digital platforms shifted the requirements of a corporate brand identity.


As the site of consumer engagement transitioned from print to web in the mid- to late-2000s, many brands found themselves with identity systems that were unequipped for the technical constraints of the web at the time, which lacked broad device compatibility, support for responsive design, or opportunities for nuanced customization. Companies with more visually dense or decorative logos like Yves Saint Laurent and Spotify were saddled with brand elements that rendered poorly at small sizes, especially on early mobile devices. Alongside a broad industry taste shift away from 90s and Y2K maximalism towards more modernist aesthetics, the move towards minimal sans serifs was also practical one at heart—removing charm in favor of readability and clearer resolution.


Image 1 courtesy Élise Rigollet for Herbar. Image 2 courtesy Victor Work for Sol’ace.



Back in the present day, we’ve returned to these older, more over-the-top aesthetics, as well as to the logos that accompany them. Y2K is in the zeitgeist, and we’re seeing a rise in quirkier logotypes inspired by every era, from bulbous bubble letters to delicate scripts. It’s no surprise that we’re craving new places to put these logos where their smallest details can be best appreciated. Élise Rigollet, who used a big footer in the website design for mycology-based skincare brand Herbar, echoes this sentiment. “I chose to feature the logo at this size purely because so much work went into it,” she explains. “I drew it, then had typographer Manuel Marsoudet perfect it. Using it at this scale allows the details and beautiful curves to really shine, especially since it is used at smaller sizes on other mediums.”


Of course, taste cycles aside, improved technologies play as much of a role in the return of oddball logos (and the corresponding Big Footer) as early technologies did in their initial demise. Advances in hardware, like the introduction of Retina screens, support the use of more complex logos on the web, even those that feature high contrast and thin hairlines. (If you can watch HBO Max on your 5-inch iPhone, you can read a Spencerian script online.) Faster internet speeds also allow for the use of more data-heavy content without the burden of waiting for it to load. Lastly, as Mike Wagz, co-founder and partner at Self Aware Studio (itself a proponent of The Big Footer in their work for Clubhouse and Middle Child) points out, increasingly broad browser support for CSS grid layout (over 96% support globally, according to caniuse.com) makes these more editorially-driven layouts easier to build than ever.


Image 1 courtesy Self Aware Studio for Clubhouse. Image 2 courtesy A.A. Trabucco-Campos + Matteo Bologna for Glyphs.



If it seems counterintuitive that the trend towards large logos on the web would occur predominantly in the footer, an area usually ignored, that’s because it is. But for some reason, there’s something about the Big Footer that seems hard for designers to shake. Perhaps it's the increased use of mobile devices for web browsing; on a phone, where menus are condensed into hamburgers and information competes for space, a big header is harder to fit in than a big footer.